IMPLIKASI TEORI BELAJAR KONSTRUKTIVISME VYGORSKY TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA KRISTEN

Imelda Ch Pocerattu

doi:10.37196/tp.v20i1.130

Authors

Imelda Ch Pocerattu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37196/tp.v20i1.130

Keywords:

Vygorsky Constructionist, Christian Religious Education

Abstract

Constructivism theory is one of many learning theories that have been designed in the implementation of Christian Religious Education learning. Like behaviorism and cognitivism, constructivism can be applied in various learning activities in both the social and exact sciences. The purpose of this study is to describe the implications of Vygotsky's theory of constructivism in the implementation of the Christian Religious Education learning model, the urgency of constructivism theory in Christian Religious Education learning and the implications of constructivism in PAK learning. This research is a theoretical research with data acquisition through various articles in various journals, books, and other print media related to Vygotsky's theory of constructivism. The results of this study indicate that the implications of constructivism theory in the implementation of PAK learning are very appropriate. Students will be more enthusiastic if learning is more student focused.

References

Authentic, D. A. N., & Sekolah, A. (2013). The analysis of integrative thematic content, scientific approach, and authentic assessment in elementary school textbooks, 1–15.

Borchelt, N. (2007). Cognitive Computer Tools in The Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Calculus. International Journal for The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(2):1-17.

Drake, S.M. (2012). Creating standards based integrated curriculum: the commom core state standards edition. California. Corwin Press A sagePublication Company.

Galloway, C. M. (2001). Vygotsky's Constructionism. In M Orey (Ed.). Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, And Technology. Georgia: College of Education University of Georgia.

Glasersfeld, E. V. (1989). Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspect of The Radical Constructivist Position. Research and Reflexivity: Toward a Cbernetic/Social Constructivist Way of Knowing. London: Sage

Hamalik, O. (2010). Proses belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri pendidikan Nasional dan Kebudayaan RI No 67 Tahun 2013 tentang standar proses.

M. Fadlillah. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dalam Pembelajaran SD/MI, SMP/MTs, &SMA/MA. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz.

Moll, L. C. (1990). Vygotsky and Education (Rev.ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nur, Mohamad dan Wikandari, P. Retno. 2004. Pengajaran Berpusat kepada Siswa dan Pendekatan Konstruktivis dalam Pengajaran. UNESA, PSMS.

Prasetyo, T., Zulela, & Fahrurrozi, F. (2021). Analisis Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Dalam Pembelajaran Daring Bahasa Indonesia. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), 3617–3628.

Rizky, W. (2017). Penerapan Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbantuan Media Video Kelas Vii Di Smpn 87 Jakarta

Syahrul. (2020). Teori-Teori Pembelajaran: Multikultural, Humanis, Kritis, Konstruktivis, Reflektivis, Dialogis, Progresif. Malang: Literasi Nusantara

Wilson, B.G., Teslow, J.L., & Taylor, L., 1993, “Instructional design perspective on mathematics education with reference to Vygotsky’s theory of social cognition”, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, Vol. 15.