Overview of divorce factors analysis: a case study in Watmuri Village, Tanimbar Islands Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37196/mc.v12i2.160Keywords:
Divorce factors, Tanimbar Islands Regency, Watmuri Village, Prevent divorceAbstract
This article presents a comprehensive analysis of divorce factors, focusing particularly on Watmuri Village in the Tanimbar Islands Regency. The study investigates key contributors to divorce, namely infidelity, disputes, and continuous conflicts. Through scrutiny of two hundred and thirty-eight divorce cases adjudicated in the General Court of Dobo, patterns and trends were identified. Additionally, data sourced from the Office of Religious Affairs highlighted twenty-three divorce cases associated with infidelity, disputes, and economic challenges. Employing a qualitative approach, specifically a case study methodology, the research delved deeply into the intricacies of divorce dynamics. This method facilitated an exhaustive examination of programs, events, processes, and activities pertinent to individuals undergoing marital dissolution. Through meticulous data collection procedures conducted over an extended timeframe, researchers closely aligned their observations with the temporal and behavioral patterns of the subjects. The findings of this study contribute significantly to the understanding of divorce dynamics in Watmuri Village and provide valuable insights into the factors influencing marital breakdown in the Tanimbar Islands Regency. Furthermore, the qualitative approach employed offers a nuanced perspective on the complexities inherent in divorce proceedings, shedding light on the multifaceted nature of marital discord
References
E. Parmentier, “The Ritualization of Marriage in the Churches of the Reformation: A Language to Express the Encounter of Human and Divine Love,” Stud. Liturg., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 29–47, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1177/003932070203200103.
E. S. Scott and R. E. Scott, “Marriage as Relational Contract,” Va. Law Rev., vol. 84, no. 7, p. 1225, Oct. 1998, doi: 10.2307/1073673.
K. Burhan, “Analisis faktor penyebab perceraian karena ekonomi (studi kasus di Pengadilan Agama Salatiga Tahun 2017).” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2018.
D. W. Leinweber, The role of metamorphosis in Greco-Roman religious thought. Michigan State University, 1992.
G. K. Beale and D. A. Carson, Commentary on the New Testament use of the Old Testament. Baker Books, 2007.
W. Janzen, Old Testament ethics: A paradigmatic approach. Westminster John Knox Press, 1994.
J. Zaloudek, “Evangelicals’ Sanctification of Marriage through the Metaphor of Jesus as a Husband,” Religions, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 623–647, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.3390/rel5030623.
R. Birtwistle, “Daylight and darkness: Images of Christians in mixed marriages,” Islam Christ. Relations, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 331–342, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1080/09596410600795001.
G. Douglas, N. Doe, S. Gilliat-Ray, R. Sandberg, and A. Khan, “Social Cohesion and Civil Law: Marriage, Divorce and Religious Courts,” Divorce and Religious Courts. 2011, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1940387.
E. I. Pakhomova, “Marriage and Divorce: What Has Changed in the Perceptions of Russians?,” Russ. Educ. Soc., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 30–41, May 2009, doi: 10.2753/RES1060-9393510502.
R. Riyanto and A. Cholil, “Implementation Agreement By Mixed Marriage Based On Act No. 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage After Constitutional Court Ruling No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 (Study of Notary Role),” J. Akta, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 829–836, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.30659/akta.v5i4.3712.
P. Darke, G. Shanks, and M. Broadbent, “Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 273–289, Oct. 1998, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.1998.00040.x.
M. D. Regnerus, “Religion and Positive Adolescent Outcomes: A Review of Research and Theory,” Rev. Relig. Res., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 394–413, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.2307/3512217.
N. L. Leech and A. J. Onwuegbuzie, “An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 557–584, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557.
H. Torrance, “Triangulation, Respondent Validation, and Democratic Participation in Mixed Methods Research,” J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 111–123, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1558689812437185.
J. Cho and E.-H. Lee, “Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences,” Qual. Rep., vol. 19, no. 30, pp. 1–20, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1028.
N. R. Burstein, “Economic influences on marriage and divorce,” J. Policy Anal. Manag., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 387–429, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1002/pam.20257.
M. Mahapatro, “Understanding Domestic Violence,” in Domestic Violence and Health Care in India, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018, pp. 1–46. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6159-2_1
S. B. Scott, G. K. Rhoades, S. M. Stanley, E. S. Allen, and H. J. Markman, “Reasons for divorce and recollections of premarital intervention: Implications for improving relationship education,” Couple Fam. Psychol. Res. Pract., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 131–145, 2013, doi: 10.1037/a0032025.
A. Booth and P. Amato, “Divorce and Psychological Stress,” J. Health Soc. Behav., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 396–407, Dec. 1991, doi: 10.2307/2137106.
H. C. Boado and A. G. Ferrer, “The impact of physical separation from parents on the mental wellbeing of the children of migrants,” J. Ethn. Migr. Stud., vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2436–2454, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2021.1935670.
R. Ormerod, “The history and ideas of sociological functionalism: Talcott Parsons, modern sociological theory, and the relevance for OR,” J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 1873–1899, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1640590.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yusly Pentury, Samuel Sopakua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
