The school committee's role in developing educational units

Bernadus N Nifmaskossu; Samuel Sopakua

doi:10.37196/mc.v12i2.157

Authors

Bernadus N Nifmaskossu Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Ambon
Samuel Sopakua Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37196/mc.v12i2.157

Keywords:

School committees, Educational development, Decision-making, Stakeholder engagement

Abstract

This study examines the pivotal role of school committees in shaping educational development, focusing on SMP Negeri 6 Ambon as a case study. Employing a qualitative research approach, data collection methods such as interviews and observations were utilized. Data analysis adhered to Burhan Bungin's methodology, involving data collection, reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. The research underscores the multifaceted functions of the school committee: (1) Advisory Support: The committee provides guidance throughout various planning and program development stages, including infrastructure maintenance, book procurement, and educational management considerations; (2) Support for Educational Quality: Financial, emotional, and moral backing from the committee contributes to the implementation and improvement of educational standards at SMP Negeri 6 Ambon; (3) Decision-making Control: The committee exercises authority over educational planning and decision-making processes, overseeing both the allocation of resources and the management of educational outcomes; (4) Mediation and Policy Communication: Acting as intermediaries between parental and community expectations and school policies, the committee ensures transparency and alignment of objectives. Research findings indicate that while the committee is perceived as a supplementary organizational entity, attendance discrepancies among administrators suggest a lack of awareness regarding their roles and responsibilities. Committee administrators are selected through consensus at school meetings, with recommendations provided by teachers at SMP Negeri 6 Ambon. This study contributes to understanding the intricate dynamics of school committee involvement in educational advancement.

References

S. S. Boocock, “The School as a Social Environment for Learning: Social Organization and Micro-Social Process in Education,” Sociol. Educ., vol. 46, no. 1, p. 15, Jan. 1973, doi: 10.2307/2112204.

S. M. Buring et al., “Interprofessional Education: Definitions, Student Competencies, and Guidelines for Implementation,” Am. J. Pharm. Educ., vol. 73, no. 4, p. 59, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.5688/aj730459.

E. S. Nurdin, “The Policies on Civic Education in Developing National Character in Indonesia,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 199–209, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n8p199.

H. Herwan, A. Aswandi, and M. Chiar, “The Role of School Committee in Supporting The Fulfillment of Education Facilities and Infrastructure,” JETL (Journal Educ. Teach. Learn., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 282–287, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.26737/jetl.v3i2.763.

A. Fitriah, B. Sumintono, N. B. Subekti, and Z. Hassan, “A different result of community participation in education: an Indonesian case study of parental participation in public primary schools,” Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 483–493, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s12564-013-9275-8.

E. S. B. Herawati, N. Nuraya, Adiman, and R. R. Aliyyah, “School Committee Support for Improving the Quality of Education Services,” in 1st Annual International Conference on Natural and Social Science Education (ICNSSE 2020), 2021, pp. 321–327, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210430.048.

D. Pendidikan, “Lampiran II Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 044/U/2002 Tanggal 2 April 2002 Tentang Dewan Pendidikan Dan Komite Sekolah.” Jakarta, 2002.

K. M. Borman, M. D. Lecompte, and J. P. Goetz, “Ethnographic and Qualitative Research Design and Why It Doesn’t Work,” Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 42–57, Sep. 1986, doi: 10.1177/000276486030001006.

J. L. Hanson, D. F. Balmer, and A. P. Giardino, “Qualitative Research Methods for Medical Educators,” Acad. Pediatr., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 375–386, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.05.001.

L. S. Whiting, “Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers,” Nurs. Stand., vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 35–40, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.7748/ns2008.02.22.23.35.c6420.

S. F. Turner, L. B. Cardinal, and R. M. Burton, “Research Design for Mixed Methods,” Organ. Res. Methods, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 243–267, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1094428115610808.

A. Hussein, “The use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research,” J. Comp. Soc. Work, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 106–117, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.31265/jcsw.v4i1.48.

J. Sim, B. Saunders, J. Waterfield, and T. Kingstone, “Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori?,” Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 619–634, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1454643.

J. Côté, J. H. Salmela, A. Baria, and S. J. Russell, “Organizing and Interpreting Unstructured Qualitative Data,” Sport Psychol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 127–137, Jun. 1993, doi: 10.1123/tsp.7.2.127.

N. L. Leech and A. J. Onwuegbuzie, “Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond.,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 587–604, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.587.

A. J. Barnett et al., “An iterative approach to case study analysis: insights from qualitative analysis of quantitative inconsistencies,” Int. J. Commons, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 467, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.18352/ijc.632.

N. King, “Using Templates in the Thematic Analysis of Text,” in Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2004, pp. 256–270. doi: 10.4135/9781446280119.n21

A. Gultom and E. Daryanto, “Policy Analysis and Decision Making in The Community In Accordance with Government Regulation No. 39 of 1992 CHAPTER III Article 4 And Decree of The Minister of National Education Number 044/U/2002,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018), 2018, doi: 10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.105.

S. Lefever-Davis, C. Johnson, and C. Pearman, “Two Sides of a Partnership: Egalitarianism and Empowerment in School-University Partnerships,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 204–210, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.3200/JOER.100.4.204-210.

K. J. Brehony, “The ‘school masters’ parliament’: the origins and formation of the Consultative Committee of the Board of Education 1868?1916,” Hist. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 171–193, Jun. 1994, doi: 10.1080/0046760940230203.

S. Khasanatun and S. A. Permana, “The Role of the School Committee in Improving the Quality of Education At SD Negeri Kauman Kapanewon Pleret,” in 2nd UPY International Conference on Education and Social Science (UPINCESS 2023), 2023, pp. 408–412, doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-176-0_58.

P. Rose, “Community Participation in School Policy and Practice in Malawi: Balancing local knowledge, national policies and international agency priorities,” Comp. A J. Comp. Int. Educ., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 47–64, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1080/03057920302597.

N. Suharto and E. Sofyan, “Community participation in the management of school facilities and infrastructure development,” JPPI (Jurnal Penelit. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 160–167, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.29210/020232217.